Was this article helpful?
Time-on-page is misleading. Someone confused stays longer. This gives you a direct quality signal — per article.
Why this template
The questions (2)
Was this article helpful?
Emoji scaleWhat would make it more useful?
Open textWhen to trigger it
How to read the results
Per-article average <3/5: article needs rewriting or updating
Per-article average >4/5: strong content, consider promoting more aggressively
Q2 themes across articles: reveal systematic content gaps (e.g., "more real examples" means all articles need examples)
Compare scores across articles to find your best and worst content
What to do next
Rank articles by helpfulness score
Bottom 10%: rewrite, update, or consolidate with better articles
Top 10%: promote more aggressively, create more on those topics
Systematic Q2 themes: apply improvements across all content
Recommended configuration
Bottom bar
Bottom
Scroll 80%
Blog / docs / help center
Related templates
What should we write about next?
Stop guessing content topics. Let your audience tell you exactly what they want — and why.
Why didn't you sign up?
Analytics tells you where they drop off. This tells you why — in their own words.
Pricing page clarity check
Is your pricing page clear — or are visitors too polite to tell you it's confusing?